Chile or Argentina within May?
I'm taking a family leave in May to South America, and I thought I'd receive some opinions on which country to step to. So what country would be better in May? Chile or Argentina? Also which country would you to some extent go to no concern what the season?
Answers: I've been to both Chile and Argentina, so I might enjoy some ideas... I don't know how long you're gonna be here, but if you like attractive landscapes Chile south of Santiago is in recent times beautiful. Very remote places, gorgeous "sea district" and south of Pto. Montt you can find cold rainforest (a week's drive from Santiago if you take seriously of time). There are some tourist places like Pucón where on earth Chileans and foreigners meet, but it's pretty touristy.
My warning would be to rent a pickup truck (Nissan and Toyota trucks are common there) surrounded by Santiago (Hertz have a appropriate offer), take a tent and drive around. Get stale the paved roads and you will utterly savour it. Buses are available but you can't get rotten the main roads! And within Chile buses are very much of an... jaunt sometimes. The people surrounded by Chile are unbelievably helpful and unscrew, there is literally no crime outside the cities - no robberies, even rampant camping is toally secure (although not officially legally recognized, but nobody cares as long as you don't harrass people). Camping on lake and the shore is fully acceptable, everybody does it.
Unfortunately food is one of the lowlights, one sort of bread, one brand of cheese, little can food for travelling around with (apart from can fish)
Argentina would propably see you starting in Buenos Aires, which is a great city (compared to the to some extent dull Santiago). The food is just harmonious and much cheaper than in Chile. Around Bs As you will find loads of agriculture, zilch special. The south is filled beside wide pampa, a blowing hard, barren and lonely place, but impressive to see. The north west have impressive landscape, but much bigger distances than Chile. And more paved roads, which finances less fun driving ;-)
Camping is impractical everywhere thanks to plentiful fences and newly little nice spots but still possible.
The Andes are just unjust, if you have the time run into the Altiplano, across one of the 4000+ m mountain passes. Be sure to attain up slowly to give you and the kids the adjectives to adapt to the altitude. And go and get a turbocharged car, adjectives others don't have power within the thin nouns.
In general: Chile is more up to a european/US standard, A. is still recovering from the economical crash. The countryside is still exceedingly "simple" in both countries.
Argentina.. Go to Argentine.
It's a lovely country.
In Argentina you would not touch so different because of the population and the western/occidental influence. However, if you’re coming to south America looking for a country more similar to a common Latin American country, Chile is more similar to those. that's drop for both of those countries but the weather varies depending on latitude and altitude. argentina is awesome. it's a vastly european country. the people adjectives have white skin and similar to to sit in café loudly discussing wine and politics. chileans are more meztizo (indian blood) but even they feel european compared beside, say, peru. if you resembling the outdoors, san pedro de atacama in chile is surrounded by my opinion around the most incredible place on earth! otherwise, buenos aires is the place to step. truly one of the great cities of the world!
More Questions & Answers...
