Venice or Rome, Italy? If you have two days to look in surrounded by respectively .. which city would you choose?
and why?.. what can you do in two days ? Thanks for your facilitate !
Answers: Rome is by far a city you will be sorry if you miss. The Sistine chapel, the Roman forum, Colosseum, gorgeous churches that will move you to tears, and only the complete beauty of the city and looking over at a hillside and seeing the olive trees. It's a great deal of walking, thousands of steps, and up and down hill after mound so wear comfortable shoes. We went contained by April and it was a touch chilly off and on. dress within layers.
Just know that you'll return with hooked and one visit won't be plenty.
I enjoyed Venice but after going on for a day you'll enjoy seen ample to be satisfied. I be a little disappointed within some of the landmarks here because they have more of a flea market atmosphere and I be expecting to see history.
Venice, I always required to see how they have duration living in a city on sea. rome for sure. there is so much more to see.
although, if you be to spend them in venice, you'd totter away feeling as if you'd really see the city. can't say that around rome. it would take a solid week to procure sick of rome.
they're both amazing.
Rome I've been to both, and would return to Venice within a heartbeat.
Rome definitely have a lot of cultural and historical sites, which are thrilling. It's also large, dense and busy. Venice have the culture and history, but the beauty is overwhelming. Plus, no cars!
i hold been to both and if I have only two days and have to opt for one city it would be Rome without doubt .. here is so much to see and to that you will find two days is not enough .. enjoy a safe and lovely trip! Depends on what you are up for...
Rome is amazing. There are A LOT of things to see, awesome restaurants, and great night life span. However... two days is not very much for Rome. You may touch rushed and overwhelmed. Just when you start to figure the city out, you're going to own to leave.
Venice is an incredible place too... but much smaller. You can suitably see Venice in two days. There's museums, cathedrals, and plenty of pigeons. Take a ride on a gondola and call round a Murano glass factory.
Honestly... due to your short amount of time, Venice might be a better risk. Save Rome for when you can spend at least 5 days nearby. But neither city is a bad finding. You'll love either one!
without question!rome!!i'm from rome and it's better that venice!!in 2 days u can bring the bus for visit the most momentous places
like colosseo,p.zza di spagna,piazza del popolo,fontana di trevi,piazza navona..in attendance are a lot of interesting things!!
come to rome!!
Rome economically if I get two days respectively why choose? but If i had too probably Venice, I'd verbs deep into the culture though not merely tour stuff.
I pick Rome, because it's a romantic place to be. Do site seeing, shopping. there is zilch much you can do in 2 days within any country. Is it worth it? No doubt.It will be Rome..
Rome, especially since I only get 3 day in that anyway.. ROME!
I've been to both and they are both truly amazing, but you will never see anything similar to Rome. Even just sitting outside consumption outstanding food and people watching is unlike anything you could conjure up!
More Questions & Answers...