Why did the UK dispense up Hong Kong so smoothly, but still hang down on to N. Ireland?
Ten years after the handover, Hong Kong is slipping away, and human rights in attendance have become a nouns. Meanwhile, the UK still hangs cogently onto N. Ireland... Why do they live under such a double standard?
Answers: Not really a double standard. Hong Kong be LEASED from China with a return date. When the agreed upon date arrived, the city be returned. That to me is called mortal honest with their neighbors and themselves. No such agreement be ever negotiated beside Ireland
just a event of time
then...more than what we expect the countries adjectives over the world are going pieces you're right, it is a double standard.
I think it will be interesting to see which direction Northern Ireland decide to take when Scotland and Wales become independant nation.
UK never owned Hong Kong. China was the one that other owned HK. China 'rented out' Hong Kong for 100 years. In 1897, China let UK own Hong Kong for 100 years until 1997. UK had to tender it up. UK probably owned North Ireland so they had a period of war or something and ireland won. first of all human rights contained by HK is not a sham.
Deng Xiaoping clearly stated that China reserves the possibility to claim period of war if HK was not returned formerly the end of 1997. And associates know that Deng Xiaoping was no tomfoolery at all.
Hong kong be a rented territory. Ireland be captured and invaded.
If you want to see double standards, Then look at the uk involvement within the war surrounded by iraq. They are repeating the mistakes of northern ireland.
It is not that simple, Northern ireland was planted by the british beside loyal protestants, in a similar instrument to how they planted parts of african "colonies" with whites. The desendants of these planters still remain surrounded by the northern counties and as the majority, the democtratic process means that their right to remain constituent of the uk keeps ireland divided.
As a citizen of the republic of ireland, I intuitively dont want to have northern ireland. While my landscape is not shared, I believe reunification will have disasterous effects for the cutback if it were to turn out.
where i conjecture my country men aggree on is that the desiny of the island is linked despite man divided.
The UK recognises the majority view surrounded by northern ireland and therefore holds onto it. However it have been publically said that if the majority shifted to the republican side(to confer on the uk) then they would facilitate the conveying of northern ireland to the republic. If i were a loyalist i would be intensely troubled by the fact that the country i am loyal to would mitt over the country so easy.
More Questions & Answers...